Escrevendo a história do pensamento econômico-ecológico: desafios e perspectivas
Palavras-chave:
economia ecológica, história intelectual, interdisciplinaridade forte, historiografia, longue duréeResumo
A história do pensamento econômico-ecológico (PEE) tem sido construída de diversas formas e de acordo com diferentes fundamentos, dado o caráter evolutivo de conceitos relacionados a processos naturais e econômicos. Este artigo propõe um arcabouço teórico para se entender o PEE como um conjunto de ideias interligando as esferas social e natural por meio de ontologias e epistemologias compartilhadas. Essas ideias se opõem a dicotomias entre o humano e o natural que caracterizam o pensamento ocidental moderno, contribuindo para a elucidação de desafios contemporâneos no contexto da sustentabilidade e oferecendo uma história intelectual estruturada das raízes da economia ecológica. O artigo defende que escrever a história do PEE requer o escrutínio dos desafios historiográficos, em particular dos riscos associados ao presentismo e ao anacronismo; além disso, ele traz uma revisão da literatura sobre PEE e, finalmente, identifica novas linhas de pesquisa com destaque para narrativas globais.
Referências
Akerman, M., 2003. What does “natural capital” do? The role of metaphor in economic understanding of the environment. Environmental Values Vol. 12: 431-448.
Albritton Jonsson, F., 2013. Enlightenment’s Frontier: the Scottish highlands and the origins of environmentalism. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Bhaskar, R., 2008. A Realist Theory of Science. Routledge, London.
Bobulescu, R., 2017. The original time approach of Georgescu-Roegen. Œconomia - History | Methodology | Philosophy Vol. 7(1): 87-109.
Borowy, I. e M. Schmelzer (eds) 2017. History of the Future of Economic Growth: historical roots of current debates on sustainable degrowth. Routledge, London & New York.
Braudel, F., 1958. Histoire et sciences sociales: la longue durée. Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations Vol. 13(4): 725-753.
Brooks, H. e I.B. Cohen, 1994. A Conversation with Harvey Brooks on the social sciences, the natural sciences, and public policy – conducted by I. Bernard Cohen, em Cohen, I.B. (ed) The Natural Sciences and the Social Sciences. Some critical and historical perspectives. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston & London, pp. 363-398.
Brown, G.M., Smith, V.K., Munro, G.R. e R. Bishop, 2016. Early pioneers in natural resource economics. Annual Review of Resource Economics Vol. 8(1): 25-42.
Burkett, P., 2009. Marxism and Ecological Economics: toward a red and green political economy. Haymarket Books, Chicago.
Butterfield, H., 1931. The Whig Interpretation of History. G. Bell, London.
Cechin, A.D. e J.E. Veiga, 2010. A economia ecológica e evolucionária de Georgescu-Roegen. Revista de Economia Política Vol. 30: 438-454.
Christensen, P.P., 1987. Classical roots for a modern materials-energy analysis. Ecological Modelling Vol. 38(1–2): 75-89.
Christensen, P.P., 1989. Historical roots for ecological economics – biophysical versus allocative approaches. Ecological Economics Vol. 1: 17-36.
Couix, Q., 2019. Natural resources in the theory of production: the Georgescu-Roegen/Daly versus Solow/Stiglitz controversy. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought Vol. 26(6): 1341-1378.
Daggett, C.N., 2019. The Birth of Energy. Fossil fuels, thermodynamics, and the politics of work. Duke University Press, Durham & London.
D’Alisa, G., Demaria, F. e G. Kallis (eds) 2015. Degrowth: a vocabulary for a new era. Routledge, New York & London.
Daly, H.E., 1986. The economic thought of Frederick Soddy, em Kauffman, G. B. (ed) Frederick Soddy (1877–1956). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 199-218.
Dequech, D., 2007. Neoclassical, mainstream, orthodox, and heterodox economics. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics Vol. 30(2): 279-302.
DesRoches, C.T., 2018. On the historical roots of natural capital in the writings of Carl Linnaeus. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology Vol. 36(C): 103-117.
Douai, A., 2009. Value theory in ecological economics: the contribution of a political economy of wealth. Environmental Values Vol. 18(3): 257-284.
Edwards-Jones, G., Davies, B. e S. Hussain, 2000. A Brief History of Ecological Economic Thought, em Edwards-Jones, G., B. Davies e S. Hussain (eds) Ecological Economics: an introduction. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, pp. 10-29.
Evenden, M.D., 1995. The laborers of nature: economic ornithology and the role of birds as agents of biological pest control in North American agriculture, ca. 1880-1930. Forest & Conservation History Vol. 39(4): 172-183.
Faber, M., e J.L.R. Proops, 1985. Interdisciplinary research between economists and physical scientists: retrospect and prospect. Kyklos Vol. 38(4): 599-616.
Fischer-Kowalski, M., 1998. Society’s metabolism: the intellectual history of materials flow analysis, part I, 1860-1970. Journal of Industrial Ecology Vol. 2(1): 61-78.
Fischer-Kowalski, M. e W. Hüttler, 1998. Society’s metabolism: the intellectual history of materials flow analysis, part II, 1970-1998. Journal of Industrial Ecology Vol. 2(4): 107-136.
Fisher, I., 1925. Mathematical Investigations in the Theory of Value and Prices. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Foster, J.B., 2000. Marx’s Ecology: materialism and nature. Monthly Review Press, New York.
Foster, J.B. e P. Burkett, 2004. Ecological economics and classical Marxism: the “Podolinsky business” reconsidered. Organization & Environment Vol. 17(1): 32-60.
Franco, M.P.V., 2018. Searching for a scientific paradigm in ecological economics: the history of ecological economic thought, 1880s-1930s. Ecological Economics Vol. 153: 195-203.
Franco, M.P.V., 2020. Conservation, economic planning and natural capital in early Soviet ecology. Ecosystem Services Vol. 41: 101064.
Fressoz, J.-B. e F. Locher, 2020. Les Révoltes du ciel. Une histoire du changement climatique XVe-XXe siècle. Seuil, Paris.
Gare, A., 1993. Soviet environmentalism: the path not taken. Capitalism Nature Socialism Vol. 4(4): 69-88.
Georgescu-Roegen, N., 1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA & London.
Glacken, C.J., 1996. Traces on the Rhodian Shore: nature and culture in Western thought from ancient times to the end of the eighteenth century. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Gómez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P.L. e C. Montes, 2010. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics Vol. 69(6): 1209-1218.
Goodwin, C.D., 2008. Ecologist meets economics: Aldo Leopold, 1887–1948. Journal of the History of Economic Thought Vol. 30(4): 429-452.
Gowdy, J.M. e S. Mesner, 1998. The evolution of Georgescu-Roegen’s bioeconomics. Review of Social Economy Vol. 56(2): 136-156.
Goyette, S., 2016. Interdisciplinarity helps solving real-world problems. Regional Environmental Change Vol. 16(3): 593-594.
Hall, J. e S. Kirdina-Chandler, 2017. Towards an intellectual history of evolutionary economics: competition and struggle versus cooperation and mutual aid. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy Vol. 37(3): 551-564.
Hodgson, G.M., 1993. Economics and evolution: bringing life back into economics. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
Hodgson, G.M., 1998. The Approach of institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature Vol. 36(1): 166-192.
Hodgson, G.M., 2008. Metaphor and pluralism, em Fullbrook, E. (ed) Pluralist Economics. Zed Books, New York, pp. 128-150.
Jardine, N., 2000. Uses and abuses of anachronism in the history of the sciences. History of Science Vol. 38(3): 251-270.
Jardine, N., 2003. Whigs and stories: Herbert Butterfield and the historiography of science. History of Science Vol. 41(2): 125-140.
Jardine, N. e E.C. Spary, 1996. The natures of cultural history, em Jardine, N., J.A. Secord e E.C. Spary (eds) Cultures of Natural History. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 3-13.
Jerneck, A. et al., 2011. Structuring sustainability science. Sustainability Science Vol. 6(1): 69-82.
Jonas, H., 1979. Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Insel-Verlag, Frankfurt/Main.
Kallis, G. e R.B. Norgaard, 2010. Coevolutionary ecological economics. Ecological Economics Vol. 69(4): 690-699.
Kronenberg, J., 2014. What can the current debate on ecosystem services learn from the past? Lessons from economic ornithology. Geoforum Vol. 55: 164-177.
Kula, E., 1998. History of Environmental Economic Thought. Routledge, London.
Latouche, S., 2010. Degrowth. Journal of Cleaner Production Vol. 18(6): 519-522.
Lemercier, C., 2015. Une histoire sans sciences sociales ? Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales Vol. 70(2): 345-357.
Lin, Q.F., 2014. Aldo Leopold’s unrealized proposals to rethink economics. Ecological Economics Vol. 108: 104-114.
Loison, L., 2016. Forms of presentism in the history of science: rethinking the project of historical epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A Vol. 60: 29-37.
Loraux, N., 2005. Éloge de l’anachronisme en histoire. Espaces Temps Vol. 87-88: 127-139.
Martinez-Alier, J., 1987. Ecological Economics: energy, environment and society. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G. e J. O’Neill, 1998. Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics Vol. 26(3): 277-286.
Mayumi, K., 2001. The Origins of Ecological Economics. The bioeconomics of Georgescu-Roegen. Routledge, London & New York.
Melgar-Melgar, R.E. e C.A.S. Hall, 2020. Why ecological economics needs to return to its roots: the biophysical foundation of socio-economic systems. Ecological Economics Vol. 169: 106567.
Mirowski, P., 1989. More Hear than Light: economics as social physics, physics as nature’s economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Mirowski, P. (ed) 1994. Natural Images in Economic Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Missemer, A., 2012. William Stanley Jevons’ The Coal Question (1865), beyond the rebound effect. Ecological Economics Vol. 82: 97-103.
Missemer, A., 2013. Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, pour une Révolution Bioéconomique. ENS Éditions, Lyon.
Missemer, A., 2015. La peur du déclin économique face à l’épuisement des ressources naturelles, de W. Stanley Jevons à Herbert S. Jevons (1865-1915). Revue Économique Vol. 66(5): 825-842.
Missemer, A., 2017a. Les économistes et la fin des énergies fossiles (1865-1931). Classiques Garnier, Paris.
Missemer, A., 2017b. Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen and degrowth. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought Vol. 24(3): 493-506.
Missemer, A., 2018. Natural capital as an economic concept, history and contemporary issues. Ecological Economics Vol. 143: 90-96.
Nelson, R.R. e S.G. Winter, 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Norgaard, R.B., 1989. The case for methodological pluralism. Ecological Economics Vol. 1(1): 37-57.
Oreskes, N., 2013. Why I am a presentist. Science in Context Vol. 26(4): 595-609.
Parrique, T., 2019. The Political Economy of Degrowth. Tese (Doutorado em economia). Université Clermont Auvergne e Stockholm University, Clermont-Ferrand, France & Stockholm, Sweden.
Pearce, D.W., 2002. An intellectual history of environmental economics. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment Vol. 27(1): 57-81.
Persson, J., Hornborg, A., Olsson, L. e H. Thorén, 2018. Toward an alternative dialogue between the social and natural sciences. Ecology and Society Vol. 23(4): 14.
Persson, J., Thorén, H. e L. Olsson, 2018. The interdisciplinary decision problem: Popperian optimism and Kuhnian pessimism in forestry. Ecology and Society Vol. 23(3): 40.
Plumecocq, G., 2014. The second generation of ecological economics: how far has the apple fallen from the tree? Ecological Economics Vol. 107: 457-468.
Rockström, J. et al., 2009. Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society Vol. 14(2): 32.
Røpke, I., 2004. The early history of modern ecological economics. Ecological Economics Vol. 50: 293-314.
Røpke, I., 2005. Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s. Ecological Economics Vol. 55(2): 262-290.
Saes, B.M. e A.R. Romeiro, 2018. O debate metodológico na economia ecológica: indefinição ou pluralismo? Nova Economia Vol. 28(1): 127-153.
Saito, K., 2017. Karl Marx’s Ecosocialism: capitalism, nature, and the unfinished critique of political economy. Monthly Review Press, New York.
Samuelson, P.A., 1960. An extension of the Lechatelier principle. Econometrica Vol. 28(2): 368-379.
Sandmo, A., 2015. The early history of environmental economics. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy Vol. 9(1): 43-63.
Schabas, M., 1990. Ricardo Naturalized: Lyell and Darwin on the economy of nature, em Moggridge, D. (ed) Perspectives on the History of Economic Thought. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham & Northampton, pp. 40-49.
Schabas, M., 2005. The Natural Origins of Economics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London.
Schmelzer, M., 2015. The growth paradigm: history, hegemony, and the contested making of economic growthmanship. Ecological Economics Vol. 118: 262-271.
Schmidt, J.C., 2008. Towards a philosophy of interdisciplinarity: an attempt to provide a classification and clarification. Poiesis & Praxis Vol. 5(1): 53-69.
Shi, T., 2002. Ecological economics in China: origins, dilemmas and prospects. Ecological Economics Vol. 41(1): 5-20.
Spash, C.L., 2012. New foundations for ecological economics. Ecological Economics Vol. 77: 36-47.
Spash, C.L., 2020. A tale of three paradigms: realising the revolutionary potential of ecological economics. Ecological Economics Vol. 169: 106518.
Tacconi, L., 1998. Scientific methodology for ecological economics. Ecological Economics Vol. 27(1): 91-105.
Thoben, H.A.A.M., 1982. Mechanistic and organistic analogies in economics reconsidered. Kyklos Vol. 35(2): 292-306.
Thomas, W.L.Jr. (ed) 1956. Man’s Role in Changing the Face of the Earth. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Tosh, N., 2003. Anachronism and retrospective explanation: in defence of a present-centred history of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A Vol. 34(3): 647-659.
Tucker, J.A., 2003. Japanese Views of Nature and the Environment, em Selin, H. (ed) Nature across Cultures: views of nature and the environment in non-Western cultures. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 161-183.
Uebel, T.E., 2005. Incommensurability, ecology, and planning: Neurath in the socialist calculation debate, 1919-1928. History of Political Economy Vol. 37(2): 309-342.
Vianna Franco, M.P., 2020a. Ecological utopianism in Narodnik thought: Nikolay Chernyshevsky and the redemption of land. Capitalism Nature Socialism.
Vianna Franco, M.P., 2020b. The factual nature of resource flow accounting in the calculation in kind of the “Other Austrian Economics”. Œconomia - History | Methodology | Philosophy Vol. 10(3): 453-472.
Vianna Franco, M.P. e A. Missemer, no prelo. A History of Ecological Economic Thought. Routledge, London & New York.
Vivien, F.-D., 1999. From agrarianism to entropy: Georgescu-Roegen’s bioeconomics from a Malthusian viewpoint, em Mayumi, K. e J.M. Gowdy (eds) Bioeconomics and Sustainability: essays in honor of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham & Northampton, pp. 155-172.
Walls, L.D., 1995. Seeing New Worlds: Henry David Thoreau and nineteenth-century natural science. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
Warde, P., 2018. The Invention of Sustainability: nature and destiny, c. 1500-1870. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Weinberg, S., 1994. Dreams of a Final Theory: the scientist’s search for the ultimate laws of nature. Vintage Books, New York.
White, M.V., 1991. Where did Jevons’ energy come from? History of Economics Review Vol. 15: 60-72.
Wolloch, N., 2016. Nature in the History of Economic Thought: how natural resources became an economic concept. Routledge, London & New York.
Wolloch, N., 2020. Adam Smith and the concept of natural capital. Ecosystem Services Vol. 43: 101097.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
