UN ANÁLISIS BIBLIOMÉTRICO DEL SOCIOMETABOLISMO (1991-2020)
Palabras clave:
bibliobrillante, Análisis bibliométrico, VOSviewer, sociometabolismo, Contabilidad de flujo de materialesResumen
El trabajo tiene como objetivo comprender el potencial bibliográfico en torno a la investigación sociometabólica a través de la construcción de un portafolio bibliométrico. La encuesta contó con cinco palabras clave, resultando en 890 producciones científicas publicadas entre 1991-2020, disponibles en la base de datos Web Of Science (WOS). Usando el software VOSviewer y Biblioshiny, se mapearon los diez principales autores, artículos y países; además de co-citas y co-ocurrencia de palabras. Los resultados indican una red de investigación relevante en torno al sociometabolismo en Europa, la expansión de China como tema clave y la falta de artículos en inglés de América Latina, lo que representa una potencial frontera de expansión. El Journal of Cleaner Production (índice G más alto) y Ecological Economics (índice H más alto) son los vehículos más relevantes para la publicación de investigaciones sociometabólicas. Aunque los temas están interconectados conceptualmente, se aboga por una aproximación más estrecha de la colaboración en investigación entre economistas ecológicos e investigadores del sociometabolismo.
Referencias
Almind, T. C., & Ingwersen, P. (1997). Informetric analyses on the world wide web: methodological approaches to ‘webometrics’. Journal of documentation.
Alvarez-Melgarejo, M., & Torres-Barreto, M. L. (2018). Resources and capabilities from their very outset: A Bibliometric comparison between Scopus and the web of science. Rev. Eur. Stud., 10, 1.
Araújo, A. H. D. S., Andrade, D. C., & Souza, H. F. D. (2019). Metabolismo socioeconômico (MSE). Revibec: revista de la Red Iberoamericana de Economia Ecológica, 31, 0127-143.
Ayres, R. U., & Simonis, U. E. (Eds.). (1994). Industrial metabolism: Restructuring for sustainable development (Vol. 376). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
Bendels, M. H., Müller, R., Brueggmann, D., & Groneberg, D. A. (2018). Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals. PloS one, 13(1), e0189136.
Björneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2001). Perspective of webometrics. Scientometrics, 50(1), 65-82.
Bradford, S.e. Sources of infonnation on scientific subjects .Engineering. 137: 85-6, Jan. 1934.
Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12(5), 373-379.
Brunner, P. H. (1991). Metabolism of the Anthroposphere. Springer Verlag.
Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155-205.
Clark, B., & York, R. (2005). Carbon metabolism: Global capitalism, climate change, and the biospheric rift. Theory and society, 34(4), 391-428.
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of informetrics, 5(1), 146-166.
Cui, X. (2018). How can cities support sustainability: A bibliometric analysis of urban metabolism. Ecological indicators, 93, 704-717.
Decker, E. H., Elliott, S., Smith, F. A., Blake, D. R., & Rowland, F. S. (2000). Energy and material flow through the urban ecosystem. Annual review of energy and the environment, 25(1), 685-740.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
Ellis, E. C. (2015). Ecology in an anthropogenic biosphere. Ecological Monographs, 85(3), 287-331.
Fischer‐Kowalski, M., & Hüttler, W. (1998). Society's Metabolism: The Intellectual History of Materials Flow Analysis, Part II, 1970‐1 998. Journal of industrial ecology, 2(4), 107-136.
Fischer-Kowalski M., Weisz H., (1999). Society as a hybrid between material and symbolic realms. Toward a theoretical framework of society-nature interaction. Adv. Hum. Ecol. 8, p. 215–51.
Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., & Ramos-Martin, J. (2009). Multi-scale integrated analysis of societal and ecosystem metabolism (MuSIASEM): Theoretical concepts and basic rationale. Energy, 34(3), 313-322.
Giannakos, M., Papamitsiou, Z., Markopoulos, P., Read, J., & Hourcade, J. P. (2020). Mapping child–computer interaction research through co-word analysis. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 23, 100165.
Haas, W., Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., & Heinz, M. (2015). How circular is the global economy?: An assessment of material flows, waste production, and recycling in the European Union and the world in 2005. Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 19(5), 765-777.
Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Weisz, H., & Winiwarter, V. (2004). Progress towards sustainability? What the conceptual framework of material and energy flow accounting (MEFA) can offer. Land use policy, 21(3), 199-213.
Hirsch, J. E. (2007). Does the h index have predictive power?. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(49), 19193-19198.
Huisingh, D., Zhang, Z., Moore, J. C., Qiao, Q., & Li, Q. (2015). Recent advances in carbon emissions reduction: policies, technologies, monitoring, assessment and modeling. Journal of cleaner production, 103, 1-12.
Infante-Amate, J., de Molina, M. G., & Toledo, V. M. (2017). El metabolismo social. Historia, métodos y principales aportaciones. Revibec: revista iberoamericana de economía ecológica, 27, 130-152.
Infante-Amate, J., Urrego Mesa, A., & Tello Aragay, E. (2020). Las venas abiertas de América Latina en la era del antropoceno: un estudio biofísico del comercio exterior (1900-2016). Diálogos Revista Electrónica de Historia, 21(2), 177-214.
Kennedy, C., Cuddihy, J., & Engel‐Yan, J. (2007). The changing metabolism of cities. Journal of industrial ecology, 11(2), 43-59.
Kennedy, C., Pincetl, S., & Bunje, P. (2011). The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. Environmental Pollution, 159(8-9), 1965-1973.
Kennedy, C., Steinberger, J., Gasson, B., Hansen, Y., Hillman, T., Havranek, M., & Mendez, G. V. (2009). Greenhouse gas emissions from global cities. Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 19, 7297–7302.
Kennedy, C., Steinberger, J., Gasson, B., Hansen, Y., Hillman, T., Havránek, M., ... & Mendez, G. V. (2010). Methodology for inventorying greenhouse gas emissions from global cities. Energy Policy, 38(9), 4828-4837.
Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
Krausmann, F. (2004). Milk, manure, and muscle power. Livestock and the transformation of preindustrial agriculture in Central Europe. Human Ecology, 32(6), 735-772.
Krausmann, F., Erb, K. H., Gingrich, S., Lauk, C., & Haberl, H. (2008). Global patterns of socioeconomic biomass flows in the year 2000: A comprehensive assessment of supply, consumption and constraints. Ecological Economics, 65(3), 471-487.
Krausmann, F., Fischer‐Kowalski, M., Schandl, H., & Eisenmenger, N. (2008). The global sociometabolic transition: past and present metabolic profiles and their future trajectories. Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 12(5‐6), 637-656.
Krausmann, F., Gingrich, S., Eisenmenger, N., Erb, K. H., Haberl, H., & Fischer-Kowalski, M. (2009). Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century. Ecological Economics, 68(10), 2696-2705.
Krausmann, F., & Haberl, H. (2002). The process of industrialization from the perspective of energetic metabolism: Socioeconomic energy flows in Austria 1830–1995. Ecological Economics, 41(2), 177-201.
Krausmann, F., Schandl, H., & Sieferle, R. P. (2008). Socio-ecological regime transitions in Austria and the United Kingdom. Ecological Economics, 65(1), 187-201.
Leite, R. A. S., Da Silva, M. B., de Aragão, I. M., & Camargo, M. E. (2019, June). Bibliometria como trilha de conhecimento e pesquisa. V ENPI-Encontro Nacional de Propriedade Intelectual. 1094-1105.
Liedtke, C., Bienge, K., Wiesen, K., Teubler, J., Greiff, K., Lettenmeier, M., & Rohn, H. (2014). Resource use in the production and consumption system—The MIPS approach. Resources, 3(3), 544-574.
Lotka, A. J. (1926). Elements of physical biology. Science Progress in the Twentieth Century (1919-1933), v. 21, n. 82, p. 341-343.
Luis, E. C., & Celma, D. (2020). Circular economy. A review and bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 12(16), 6381.
Martinez-Alier, J., Kallis, G., Veuthey, S., Walter, M., & Temper, L. (2010). Social metabolism, ecological distribution conflicts, and valuation languages. Ecological Economics, 70(2), 153-158.
McClintock, N. (2010). Why farm the city? Theorizing urban agriculture through a lens of metabolic rift. Cambridge journal of regions, Economy and Society, 3(2), 191-207.
Nalimov, V. V., & Mulʹchenko, Z. M. (1971). Measurement of Science. Study of the Development of Science as an Information Process.
Newman, P. W. (1999). Sustainability and cities: extending the metabolism model. Landscape And Urban Planning, 44(4), 219-226.
Norgaard, R. B. (1989). The case for methodological pluralism. Ecological economics, 1(1), 37-57.
Pataki, D. E., Alig, R. J., Fung, A. S., Golubiewski, N. E., Kennedy, C. A., McPherson, E. G., ... & Romero Lankao, P. (2006). Urban ecosystems and the North American carbon cycle. Global Change Biology, 12(11), 2092-2102.
Parra, M. R., Coutinho, R. X., & Pessano, E. F. C. (2019). Um breve olhar sobre a cienciometria: origem, evolução, tendências e sua contribuição para o ensino de ciências. Revista Contexto & Educação, 34(107), 126-141.
Pataki, D. E., Alig, R. J., Fung, A. S., Golubiewski, N. E., Kennedy, C. A., McPherson, E. G., ... & Romero Lankao, P. (2006). Urban ecosystems and the North American carbon cycle. Global Change Biology, 12(11), 2092-2102.
Pauliuk, S., & Müller, D. B. (2014). The role of in-use stocks in the social metabolism and in climate change mitigation. Global Environmental Change, 24, 132-142.
Schandl, H., & Schulz, N. (2002). Changes in the United Kingdom's natural relations in terms of society's metabolism and land-use from 1850 to the present day. Ecological Economics, 41(2), 203-221.
Sharifi, A. (2021). Urban sustainability assessment: An overview and bibliometric analysis. Ecological Indicators, 121, 107102.
Sneegas, G., Beckner, S., Brannstrom, C., Jepson, W., Lee, K., & Seghezzo, L. (2021). Using Q-methodology in environmental sustainability research: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review. Ecological Economics, 180, 106864.
Tanguy, A., Bahers, J. B., & Athanassiadis, A. (2020). Outsourcing of urban metabolisms and its consequences: A multiscale energy flow analysis of a French port-city. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 104951.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2007). VOS: A new method for visualizing similarities between objects. In Advances in data analysis (pp. 299-306). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
Vanti, N. A. P. (2002). Da bibliometria à webometria: uma exploração conceitual dos mecanismos utilizados para medir o registro da informação e a difusão do conhecimento. Ciência da informação, 31, 369-379.
Weisz, H., Krausmann, F., Amann, C., Eisenmenger, N., Erb, K. H., Hubacek, K., & Fischer-Kowalski, M. (2006). The physical economy of the European Union: Cross-country comparison and determinants of material consumption. Ecological Economics, 58(4), 676-698.
Wang, B., Zhang, Q., & Cui, F. (2021). Scientific research on ecosystem services and human well-being: A bibliometric analysis. Ecological Indicators, 125, 107449.
Wolman, A. (1965). The metabolism of cities. Scientific American, 213(3), 178-193.
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behaviour and the principle of least-effort. Cambridge MA edn. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Zhang, C., Fang, Y., Chen, X., & Congshan, T. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of trends in global sustainable livelihood research. Sustainability, 11(4), 1150.
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-472.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Este trabajo está bajo licencia Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
