Valoración de los servicios ecosistémicos culturales como estrategia de planificación urbana
Palabras clave:
Servicios de ecosistema, Parques Urbanos, Áreas Verdes Urbanas, Método de valoración contingente, Gasto públicoResumen
El crecimiento de la población urbana y el cambio climático han llevado a una creciente necesidad de áreas verdes urbanas que brinden servicios ecosistémicos. Esto es particularmente cierto en los países en desarrollo con una demanda creciente de infraestructura y acceso a la naturaleza. Este artículo tiene como objetivo demostrar la importancia de los servicios ecosistémicos culturales en la gestión urbana. Por lo tanto, se realizó una encuesta con 1.144 usuarios de los 10 parques de la ciudad de Recife. Usando el Método de Valoración Contingente, estimamos el impacto económico de los parques en el bienestar de la población. Con una DAP estimada entre R$ 32,69 y R$ 40,47, representando un promedio de 1,0 y 1,3% de la renta media de los encuestados. Los valores extrapolados para los usuarios potenciales de los parques mostraron que el impacto económico varió entre R$ 16,3 y R$ 30,6 millones. Esta cantidad supera los recursos utilizados por el municipio para gestionar los parques en un porcentaje que oscila entre el 20 y el 57%. Por un lado, los datos son muy significativos porque demuestran cómo la población percibe la importancia de estas áreas. Por otro lado, muestra que el impacto positivo en la provisión de estos servicios ecosistémicos es altamente justificable para que los tomadores de decisiones locales mejoren el bienestar de las poblaciones urbanas.
Referencias
Aizaki, H., Nakatani, T., & Sato, K. 2014. Stated Preference Methods Using R (1st ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press-Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17292
Alberini, A. 1995. Efficiency vs bias of willingness-to-pay estimates: bivariate and interval-data models. Journal of environmental economics and management, 29(2), 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1039
Amato-Lourenço, L. F., Moreira, T. C. L., Arantes, B. L. DE, Filho, D. F. D. S., & Mauad, T. 2016. Metrópoles, cobertura vegetal, áreas verdes e saúde. Estudos Avançados, 30(86), 113–130. Retrieved from https://www.revistas.usp.br/eav/article/view/115084
Arana, A. R. A., & Xavier, F. B. (2017). Qualidade ambiental e promoção de saúde: o que determina a realização de atividades físicas em parques urbanos? Geosul, 32(63), 179. https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-5230.2017v32n63p179
Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P. R., Leamer, E. E., Radner, R., & Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal register, 58(10), 4601-4614.
Boerema, A., Rebelo, A. J., Bodi, M. B., Esler, K. J., & Meire, P. (2017). Are ecosystem services adequately quantified? Journal of Applied Ecology, 54(2), 358–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12696
Brandli, L. L., Prietto, P. D. M., & Neckel, A. (2015). Estimating the Willingness to Pay for Improvement of an Urban Park in Southern Brazil Using the Contingent Valuation Method. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 141(4), 05014027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000254
BRASIL (2016) RESOLUÇÃO No 510, DE 7 DE ABRIL DE 2016. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde/Conselho Nacional de Saúde.
Camargo, D. M., Ramírez, P. C., Quiroga, V., Ríos, P., Férmino, R. C., & Sarmiento, O. L. (2018). Physical activity in public parks of high and low socioeconomic status in Colombia using observational methods. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 15(8), 581–591. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2017-0318
Cameron, T. A., & Quiggin, J. (1994). Estimation using contingent valuation data from a" dichotomous choice with follow-up" questionnaire. Journal of environmental economics and management, 27(3), 218-234. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1035
Castro, J. D. B. de, & Nogueira, J. M. (2019). Valoração Econômica do Meio Ambiente: Teoria e Prática (1st ed.). Curitiba: CRV.
Gong, L., Mao, B., Qi, Y., & Xu, C. (2015). A satisfaction analysis of the infrastructure of country parks in Beijing. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 14(3), 480–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.04.013
Groothuis, P. A., & Whitehead, J. C. (2002). Does don't know mean no? Analysis of'don't know'responses in dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions. Applied Economics, 34(15), 1935-1940. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840210128717
Gupta, S., Miranda, K., & Parry, I. (1995). Public expenditure policy and the environment: A review and synthesis. World Development, 23(3), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)00139-P
Haab, T. C., & McConnell, K. E. (2013). Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation. (W. E. Oates, Ed.) (2nd ed.). Northampton Massachusetts: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Hanemann, M., Loomis, J., & Kanninen, B. (1991). Statistical efficiency of double‐bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American journal of agricultural economics, 73(4), 1255-1263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242453
Hanemann, W. M. (1984). Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American journal of agricultural economics, 66(3), 332-341. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240800
Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. 2018. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1. Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure. (R. Haines-Young & M. Potschin, Eds.), Fabis Consulting. Nothinghan. Retrieved from https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2018/01/Guidance-V51-01012018.pdf
Honeck, E., Gallagher, L., Arx, B. Von, Lehmann, A., Wyler, N., Villarrubia, O., … Schlaepfer, M. A. 2021. Integrating ecosystem services into policymaking – A case study on the use of boundary organizations. Ecosystem Services, 49(October 2020), 101286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101286
Howard, M. 2001. Public Sector Economics for developing countries. Southern Economic Journal (1st ed.). Kingston: University of the West Indies Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/134714
IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 2019. Perfil dos Municípios Brasileiros. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. Retrieved from https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?view=detalhes&id=2101668
IPBES - Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. 2019. The global assessment report biodiversity and ecosystem services: summury for policymakers. Bonn,Germany. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3553579
Jones-Walters, L., & Mulder, I. 2009. Valuing nature: The economics of biodiversity. Journal for Nature Conservation, 17(4), 245–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2009.06.001
Keeler, B. L., Hamel, P., McPhearson, T., Hamann, M. H., Donahue, M. L., Meza Prado, K. A., … Wood, S. A. 2019. Social-ecological and technological factors moderate the value of urban nature. Nature Sustainability, 2(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0202-1
Lai, H., Flies, E. J., Weinstein, P., & Woodward, A. 2019. The impact of green space and biodiversity on health. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 17(7), 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2077
Latinopoulos, D., Mallios, Z., & Latinopoulos, P. 2016. Valuing the benefits of an urban park project: A contingent valuation study in Thessaloniki, Greece. Land Use Policy, 55, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.020
Liu, H., Remme, R. P., Hamel, P., Nong, H., & Ren, H. 2020. Supply and demand assessment of urban recreation service and its implication for greenspace planning-A case study on Guangzhou. Landscape and Urban Planning, 203(October 2019), 103898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103898
Londe, P. R., & Mendes, P. C. 2014. A Influência das Áreas Verdes na Qualidade de Vida Urbana. Revista Brasileira de Geografia Médica e Da Saúde, 10(18), 264–272. Retrieved from http://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/hygeia%5Cnhttp://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/hygeia/article/viewFile/26487/14869
Mandle, L., Shields-Estrada, A., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Mitchell, M. G. E., Bremer, L. L., Gourevitch, J. D., … Ricketts, T. H. 2020. Increasing decision relevance of ecosystem service science. Nature Sustainability, 4(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00625-y
Marselle, M. R., Stadler, J., Korn, H., Irvine, K. N., & Bonn, A. 2019. Biodiversity and Health in the Face of Climate Change: Perspectives for Science, Policy and Practice. Biodiversity and Health in the Face of Climate Change (’1). Cham, Switzerland: SPRINGER NATURE. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02318-8_20
Meneses, A. R. S. de. 2018. Desafios da gestão dos parques urbanos de Recife. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Retrieved from https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/33408
Mertes, J. D., & Hall, J. R. 1996. Recreation, Open Space and Greenway Guidelines (3a ed.). Lacey, WA: American Academy for Park and Recreation Administration.
Nair, D. A., Meyers, D., & van den Heuvel, O. 2019. The Biofin approach to biodiversity conservation in urban ecosystems: The case of Bangalore in India. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100903
Neckel, A., Da Silva, J. L., Saraiva, P. P., Kujawa, H. A., Araldi, J., & Paladini, E. P. 2020. Estimation of the economic value of urban parks in Brazil, the case of the City of Passo Fundo. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121369
Neto, C. C. C., Silva, C.E.M. da, Ferreira, Z. R., Albuquerque, V.E.A., Morais, I. F. S. de, Silva, I. R. V., Santos, N. F. L. dos, Albuquerque, J. S. de M. 2021. Disposição a Pagar por Espaços Verdes Urbanos. Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science. V.10 n.3 https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869
NRPA - National Recreation and Park Association 2017. Local government officials perceptions of parks and recreation. Ashburn, VA. Retrieved from https://www.nrpa.org/
NRPA - National Recreation and Park Association 2018. Promoting Parks and Recreation’s Role in Economic Development. Ashburn, VA. Retrieved from https://www.nrpa.org/
Ridding, L. E., Redhead, J. W., Oliver, T. H., Schmucki, R., McGinlay, J., Graves, A. R., … Bullock, J. M. 2018. The importance of landscape characteristics for the delivery of cultural ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Management, 206(2018), 1145–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.066
Sabyrbekov, R., Dallimer, M., & Navrud, S. 2020. Nature affinity and willingness to pay for urban green spaces in a developing country. Landscape and Urban Planning, 194(October 2019), 103700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103700
Saz Salazar, S., & García Menéndez, L. 2007. Estimating the non-market benefits of an urban park: Does proximity matter? Land Use Policy, 24(1), 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.05.011
Sang, Å. O., Hagemann, F. A., Ekelund, N., & Svännel, J. 2021. Urban ecosystem services in strategic planning in Swedish municipalities. Urban Ecosystems, 24(2), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-021-01113-7
Schipperijn, J., Bentsen, P., Troelsen, J., Toftager, M., & Stigsdotter, U. K. 2013. Associations between physical activity and characteristics of urban green space. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 12(1), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.12.002
Shimamoto, K. 2019. Empirical analysis on the determinants of urban parks. Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, 11(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.37043/jura.2019.11.1.6
Silveira, I. H. da, & Junger, W. L. 2018. Espaços verdes e mortalidade por doenças cardiovasculares no município do Rio de Janeiro. Revista de Saúde Pública, 52(49), 9. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052000290
Sukhdev, P., Wittmer, H., & Miller, D. 2014. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB): Challenges and Responses. Nature in the Balance. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676880.003.0007
Swanson, P., & Lunde, L. 2003. Public environmental expenditures reviews. Experience and emerging practice. A country environmental analysi publication. Strategy Series, (7), 80. Retrieved from: http://web.worldbank.org/archive/website00672/WEB/PDF/ESP7PEER.PDF
UN – United Nations. 2019. World population prospects 2019. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Population Prospects 2019. New York. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12283219
UN, – United Nations. 2018. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision. Demographic Research (Vol. 12). New York: United Nations. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2005.12.9
UNDP – United Nations Development Programme. 2018. BIOFIN The Biodiversity Finance Initiative Workbook 2018: Finance for Nature (3rd ed.). New York: UNDP.
Verbič, M., Slabe-Erker, R., & Klun, M. 2016. Contingent valuation of urban public space: A case study of Ljubljanica riverbanks. Land Use Policy, 56, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.033
Wan, C., & Shen, G. Q. 2015. Salient attributes of urban green spaces in high density cities: The case of Hong Kong. Habitat International, 49, 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.016
Xu, F., Wang, Y., Xiang, N., Tian, J., & Chen, L. 2020. Uncovering the willingness-to-pay for urban green space conservation: A survey of the capital area in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162(June), 105053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105053
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Este trabajo está bajo licencia Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
